The Lepocreadiidae (Digenea) of fishes from the north-east Atlantic: a review of the genusLepidapedon Stafford, 1904

The genusLepidapedon is subdivided into several species groups and subgroups of species based on the vitelline distribution and the length of the excretory vesicle. The species in each of the subgroups are listed and keys to the species in most subgroups are given. The following north-eastern Atlantic species are described or redescribed:Lepidapedon rachion fromMelanogrammus aeglefinus, Gadus morhua, Aspitrigla cuculus, Merlangius merlangus andPollachius pollachius; L. cambrensis fromEnchelyopus cimbrius; L. sommervillae n. sp. fromTrachyrincus scabrus, T. murrayi andCoryphaenoides guentheri; L. elongatum fromGadus morhua; L. gaevskayae fromCoryphaenoides (Nematonurus) armatus; L. discoveryi n. sp. fromCoryphaenoides (Nematonurus) armatus; L. arlenae n. sp. fromTrachyrincus scabrus andT. murrayi; L. mariannae n. sp. fromGaidropsarus argentatus; Lepidapedon spp. innom (Elongatum-group) fromCoryphaenoides guentheri andCoryphaenoides (Chalinura) leptolepis; L. desclersae n. sp. fromLepidion eques; L. beveridgei fromCoryphaenoides (Nematonurus) armatus andC. (Chalinura) mediterraneus; andL. zubchenkoi fromCoryphaenoides (Chalinura) leptolepis andC. (C.) profundicolus. The phylogeny, host-specificity and zoogeography of the genus are briefly discussed.     

Evolution of resident oral bacterial biota in BALB/c mice during pregnancy and lactation

To assess the influence of pregnancy and lactation on the oral microbial ecology of BALB/c mice, we followed the distribution of the predominant oral bacteria of four groups of these mice during these two periods. Compared with nonpregnant control female mice of the same age maintained under the same conditions, the distribution of the resident oral bacterial species differed significantly only during the lactation period (8–16 days after parturition). This difference could possibly be attributed to hormonal influences and/or grooming habits.     

Heterochromatin and cytogenetic polymorphisms in Cebus apella (Cebidae,Platyrrhini)

Cytogenetic studies have been carried out in 39 specimens of C. apella of different origins. Three different morphologies, one affecting the long arm of chromosome 4 and two affecting pair 17, have been detected. In each case, they can be related by paracentric inversions. Heterochromatin polymorphisms affecting terminal or interstitial C+ regions have also been observed. The length of the terminal heterochromatic region in the long arms of chromosome 11 is variable in C. apella sp., in C. a. paraguayanus and absent in the C. a. nigritus specimens studied. Interstitial C + bands can be observed in the long arms of the biarmed chromosomes 4 and 6, and in the long arms of the acrocentric pairs 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21. Interstitial C + bands in the long arms of chromosomes 4, 12, 17, and 19 are present in all animals studied, although their size is variable, especially in the case of chromosomes 17 and 19. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The major locus for multifactorial nonsyndromic cleft lip maps to mouse Chromosome 11

Cleft lip with or without cleft palate, CL(P), a common human birth defect, has a genetically complex etiology. An animal model with a similarly complex genetic basis is established in the A/WySn mouse strain, in which 20% of newborn have CL(P). Using a newly created congenic strain, AEJ.A, and SSLP markers, we have mapped a major CL(P)-causing gene derived from the A/WySn strain. This locus, here named clf1 (cleft lip) maps to Chromosome (Chr) 11 to a region having linkage homology with human 17q21-24, supporting reports of association of human CL(P) with the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA) locus.     

Coordinating conservation: global networking for species survival

The Species Survival Commission (SSC) of IUCN—the World Conservation Union is the largest, most comprehensive and diverse professional conservation network in existence today. It brings together over 6000 volunteers from more than 160 countries to contribute to the conservation of biological diversity by developing and executing programmes to study, save, restore, and manage wisely species and their habitats. The SSC is organized primarily along taxonomic lines, with members distributed in 96 Specialist Groups focusing on distinct groups of species. These groups are a source of the most current and expert information on the conservation status and priorities for action for species in the wild. As such, they provide an invaluable resource in setting priorities for captive propagation and in linking ex situ actions. In addition, the SSC has five disciplinary Specialist Groups that provide expertise to both the zoo community and field conservationists in areas such as reintroductions, veterinary medicine, captive breeding as a conservation tool, and the impact of invasive species on native flora and fauna. The effectiveness of the SSC is greatly enhanced by the close connections within its network between zoo professionals, academic scientists, field conservationists, and managers of natural resources. Challenges to the SSC currently include better information management, organization at the national level, and extending coverage in areas such as marine biodiversity.     

Time course of color induction in the honeybee

Color induction in the honeybee is investigated in color discrimination experiments. An individual bee walks in a dark arena and is trained to a self-luminant stimulus presented from below. In the dual-choice tests the dark background is replaced by a colored induction stimulus. Choice behavior is recorded by TV camera and analyzed by computer. Successive color induction is separated from simultaneous induction by analysis of the walking paths. Only successive color induction occurs. Simultaneous effects are not observed. That is a stimulus acts as a color inducing stimulus only when the bee crosses this stimulus. Thus, the color perceived by a given eye region is found to be dependent on the viewing history, but not on the stimuli presented simultaneously on neighboring parts of the retina. Color induction in the honeybee described in terms of selective sensitivity decrease (adaptation) does not explain all behavioral effects induced by the stimulus. The time course of successive color induction is calculated from the exposure times to the induction stimulus and from the choice behavior. The data suggest that color induction is complete after a few seconds. Photoreceptor adaptation is sufficient to explain the observed time course.